Showing posts with label Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Law. Show all posts

Monday, May 22, 2017

MUSolutions Webinar

MUSolutions Webinar
The Post-Launch Checklist: Business, Tax, and Intellectual Property Considerations for Your Emerging Business

Please join Meyer, Unkovic & Scott attorneys Kevin Israel, Michael Monyok and Josh Hoffman for an informative webinar of what to expect and prepare for with your growing venture. For more information and to register please visit MUSolutions Webinar.


Thursday, May 11, 2017

Mechanics' Liens Seminars

Meyer, Unkovic & Scott attorney Chad Michaelson, a Partner in the firm’s Construction & Litigation Groups, will be a featured presenter at a series of upcoming PBI seminars on the topic of “Mechanics' Liens in Pennsylvania: What You Need to Know in 2017.” The seminars are scheduled to be held in Mechanicsburg on June 19th, Pittsburgh on June 20th, and Philadelphia on June 27th.

Please see the links below for further details and registration information.

Monday, May 8, 2017

Meyer, Unkovic & Scott Welcomes Maxwell Briskman Stanfield

412.456.2870
mbs@muslaw.com
Meyer, Unkovic & Scott is pleased to welcome Maxwell Briskman Stanfield as an Associate to our Real Estate & Lending and Corporate & Business Law Practice Groups.

Mr. Stanfield represents clients in a variety of corporate, real estate and financial transactions, including those related to commercial and hospitality properties. He also advises individuals and corporations in general corporate and business transactional matters.

Prior to his earlier law firm experience in Pittsburgh, Mr. Stanfield worked as an intern in the legal department of CBS Corporation in New York, and as a legal extern for CBS Television in Los Angeles.

Mr. Stanfield earned his J.D. from Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles, and B.A. from Washington & Jefferson College in Washington, Pa.

Tuesday, May 2, 2017

Thursday, April 13, 2017

April 27 ABA IP Roundtable



What
Meyer, Unkovic & Scott is proud to sponsor the Pittsburgh Roundtable for the American Bar Association's Intellectual Property Litigation Section. These quarterly meetings allow IP litigation practitioners to network with other attorneys and discuss topics of interest.

Lunch will be provided by Meyer, Unkovic & Scott.

Who
Practicing attorneys interested in intellectual property matters. Attendees need not be members of the ABA IP Section.

Topic
Conceptual Separability:
Copyright Protection for Designs of Useful Articles

When
Thursday, April 27, 2017
12:00 Noon

Where
Meyer, Unkovic & Scott LLP
Henry W. Oliver Building, 13th Floor
535 Smithfield Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15222-2304
412-456-2800

How
Please RSVP by Monday, April 24th to: rsvp@muslaw.com

David G. Oberdick will serve as Moderator of this month's IP Roundtable.

Mr. Oberdick is Of Counsel in Meyer, Unkovic & Scott's Intellectual Property Group. He can be reached at 412.456.2881 or dgo@muslaw.com.

Thursday, January 5, 2017

New I-9 Forms Must Be Used Starting 1/22/2017


IMMIGRATION LAW REMINDER

On August 25, 2016 the Office of Management and Budget approved a revised Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification. It is expected that the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will publish a revised form by November 22, 2016.  Many of the proposed changes to Form I-9 were designed to reduce technical errors and help employers electronically complete the form after they have downloaded it from uscis.gov. Employers may continue using the current version of Form I-9 with a revision date of 03/08/2013 until January 21, 2017. After January 21, 2017, all previous versions of Form I-9 will be invalid.

All employers have an obligation to verify the identity and employment eligibility of all newly-hired employees through the completion of the Employment Eligibility and Verification Form I-9.  The Form I-9 contains the signature of the employer and the employee, and it records the relevant data from the documents that the employer inspected to confirm the employee’s authorization to work in the United States.  It is important that the employer clearly identify the reviewed documents and their identification numbers. It is not necessary to retain copies of these documents.  Employers are required to maintain for inspection the original Form I-9 for all current employees.  In the case of former employees, retention of Form I-9 is required for a period of at least three years from the date of hire or for one year after the employment relationship terminates, whichever is longer.

The U.S. Department of Labor and the Department of Homeland Security through its U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Bureau (ICE) are the government agencies with authority to audit I-9 compliance.  ICE is committed to increased work-site enforcement, particularly in cases of low skill and high turnover industries. Employers should regularly audit their I-9 procedures, compliance, and recordkeeping, as well as establish a protocol at the “front desk” to identity persons responsible to deal with government inquiry; Employers should also be sure that all policies and protocols relating to recordkeeping and government compliance are current and understood by key employees.

For more information about the new I-9 forms, or any other Immigration Law matter, please contact Elaina Smiley, Joel Pfeffer or Gary Sanderson.

Tuesday, December 27, 2016

Saturday, November 26, 2016

Court Blocks Implementation of Revised FLSA Regulations


Employment Law Alert

On Tuesday, November 22, a Federal Court Judge in the Eastern District of Texas issued a nationwide injunction halting the changes to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) regulations. This decision stops the regulations from going into effect on December 1, 2016.

Twenty one states filed an emergency motion for a preliminary injunction against the Department of Labor to halt the implementation of the revised regulations. The court found that the Plaintiff States who were challenging the law, established that the amendments to the FLSA regarding the salary level and the automatic updating of the salary every three years are without statutory authority. Therefore, the court enjoined the regulations from becoming effective on December 1, 2016.

There will likely be continued litigation and an appeal in this case, so it remains to be seen if this decision will be upheld.  Employers for now can follow the old salary threshold of $455 per week or $23,660 per year for exempt employees. Employers should keep in mind that any employee they classify as exempt from overtime must meet the duties of one of the exemption categories. The Department of Labor will be strictly scrutinizing employees' duties performed to ensure they are properly classified as exempt.

For more information about the FLSA regulations, contact employment attorney Elaina Smiley. Elaina's contact information is listed below.

This material is for informational purposes only.  It is not and should not be solely relied on as legal advice in dealing with any specific situation. 

Elaina Smiley is a Partner in Meyer, Unkovic & Scott's Employment Law Group.

She can be reached at: 412.456.2821 or es@muslaw.com.

Tuesday, November 22, 2016

Contractors Can't Sue Owners' Individual Representatives for Payment


CONSTRUCTION LAW ALERT

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has finally answered a key question that has plagued real estate developers, contractors and subcontractors for years: Can contractors hold the people who authorized the work individually liable for payment?

The issue stems from ambiguous language in the Pennsylvania Contractor and Subcontractor Payment Act (CASPA) of 1994. The act ensures that owners of a construction project pay contractors and subcontractors in a timely manner for their work. CASPA defines an "owner of a project" as anyone who owns an interest in the property and orders improvements to be made, including any successors who buy or inherit the property and agents of the owner who are acting on behalf of the owner.

The term "agents of the owner" became a point of contention in a recent case, Scungio Borst & Associates v. 410 Shurs Lane Developers, when a contractor tried to hold an "agent" individually liable for payment. In that case, contractor Scungio Borst & Associates completed construction work on a condominium complex owned by 410 Shurs Lane Developers. Robert DeBolt, who owned a 50% share in 410 Shurs, signed the contracts on the company's behalf, and gave verbal direction for Scungio to perform an additional $2.6 million worth of work. In November 2006, the developer terminated its contract with Scungio Borst, leaving $1.5 million in outstanding payments.

When Scungio requested payment for the outstanding amount, DeBolt refused on behalf of the company. Scungio then filed a lawsuit under CASPA against both the company and DeBolt, seeking to hold him personally liable. Scungio's suit against 410 Shurs went to trial, and a judge ordered 410 Shurs to pay nearly $2 million to Scungio.

Meanwhile, DeBolt filed for summary judgment, claiming he could not be held personally liable under CASPA because he was not a party to the contract as an individual. Rather, only the company was a party to the contract. The judge granted summary judgment in DeBolt's favor.

Scungio appealed the case to a seven-judge panel of the Superior Court, arguing that Scungio had been acting as an agent of the company when he ordered the work and, therefore, qualified as an "owner" liable for payment under CASPA. A majority of the judges disagreed with Scungio, asserting that the law was not intended to create individual liability for agents. Rather, CASPA merely grouped "agents" in with property owners to make it clear that project managers, architects and other representative agents were not contractors entitled to the payment benefits under CASPA. Thus, the Superior Court upheld the lower court's grant of summary judgment.

Three of the judges dissented, accepting Scungio's argument that the term "agents" has been used in other Pennsylvania laws, such as the Wage Payment Collection Law. In many of those cases, Pennsylvania courts have determined that an "agent" authorized to make decisions on a company's behalf could be held personally liable for payment.

Scungio appealed the question to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which ultimately upheld both of the lower courts' rulings. The Supreme Court emphasized that under standard contract law, a contract only imposes liability on the parties that signed the contract. The purpose of CASPA was to ensure that contractors got paid -- not to create a new class of people who are individually liable for contractual payments despite not being a party to the contract. Thus, the Supreme Court held definitively that contractors cannot hold agents for a company personally liable for contractual payments owed by the company.

For more information about liability and payment on construction projects, please contact Josh Lorenz. Josh's contact information is listed below.

This material is for informational purposes only.  It is not and should not be solely relied on as legal advice in dealing with any specific situation.

Joshua R. Lorenz is a Partner in Meyer, Unkovic & Scott's Construction Law Group. He can be reached at: 412.456.2821 or jrl@muslaw.com.

Thursday, November 17, 2016

December 2016 IP Roundtable



What
Meyer, Unkovic & Scott is proud to sponsor the Pittsburgh Roundtable for the American Bar Association's Intellectual Property Litigation Section. These quarterly meetings allow IP litigation practitioners to network with other attorneys and discuss topics of interest.

Lunch will be provided by Meyer, Unkovic & Scott.

Who
Practicing attorneys interested in intellectual property matters. Attendees need not be members of the ABA IP Section.

Topic
How to Identify and Contract with a Cloud Services Provider That You Can Truly Trust

When
Thursday, December 1, 2016
12:00 Noon

Where
Meyer, Unkovic & Scott LLP
Henry W. Oliver Building, 13th Floor
535 Smithfield Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15222-2304
412-456-2800

How
Please RSVP by Monday, November 28th to: rsvp@muslaw.com

David G. Oberdick will serve as Moderator of this month's IP Roundtable.

Mr. Oberdick is Of Counsel in Meyer, Unkovic & Scott's Intellectual Property Group. He can be reached at 412.456.2881 or dgo@muslaw.com.

Tuesday, October 4, 2016

Changes to Overtime Pay Regulations


Elaina Smiley
412-456-2821
es@muslaw.com
On Wednesday, May 18, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced new changes to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) regulations that will likely make approximately 4.2 million workers eligible for overtime pay.

As a reminder to clients, the changes will go into effect on December 1st of this year.

Under the FLSA, employers must pay workers time-and-a-half for hours worked in excess of 40 hours in a work week. The FLSA includes some exemptions to the overtime rules, intended to exclude certain "white-collar" workers from the overtime requirements. Companies do not have to pay an employee overtime wages as long as the worker passes both the salary test and the duties test to meet the FLSA exemptions from overtime pay.

Here are the five most important things to know about the changes:

1. New salary threshold is $47,476
Under the current standard, which has been in place since 2004, workers are exempt from the overtime pay requirement if they are paid a minimum salary of $455 per week or $23,660 per year and their job duties fit the FLSA's definitions of executive, administrative and professional categories. The new regulations, effective December 1, more than double the salary threshold to $913 per week or $47,476 per year.

2. Up to 10 percent of the salary threshold may be bonuses or commissions
For some employees, their weekly pay may fall below the $913 threshold, but non-discretionary bonuses, incentive pay or commissions may put their total pay over the annual minimum. Under the new rules, such an employee qualifies as exempt from overtime pay as long as the employee makes at least 90 percent of the threshold amount in salary and the remaining 10 percent is paid in non-discretionary bonuses, incentive pay or commissions distributed at least on a quarterly basis.

3. No changes to the "duties test"
Even if a worker is paid more than the minimum salary, the worker is still entitled to overtime wages unless their work passes the "duties test." To meet the duties test, the worker's job responsibilities must meet all of the FLSA's criteria established under the various exemption categories. Initially, the DOL considered changing the duties test to further restrict the types of jobs that are exempt from overtime pay, but ultimately decided against making any changes.

4. New minimum salary to qualify as a "highly compensated employee" is $134,004
The FLSA exempts "highly-compensated" workers from overtime pay as long as they regularly perform at least one job duty from the executive, administrative or professional exemption category and are paid a high salary. Previously, the DOL defined the salary of a highly compensated employee as $100,000 per year, but the new regulations raise it to $134,004.

5. The DOL will update the rules every three years
The DOL will update the minimum salary levels every three years, with the next update scheduled to take effect January 1, 2020. The DOL will calculate the new minimum salary threshold based on the pay of full-time workers in the 40th percentile in the lowest-wage census region. For highly-compensated workers, the DOL will calculate the threshold based on the wages of workers in the 90th percentile of full-time salaried workers nationwide. By 2020, the DOL expects the minimum salary level to rise to $51,168, and the salary for highly compensated workers will be roughly $147,524. The DOL will announce the new salary levels on August 1, 2019.

Employers should carefully review their current exempt employees' compensation structure to determine which workers may be eligible for overtime wages under the new regulations.  Although the changes don't take effect until December 1, companies should monitor those employees' work hours now to determine the most cost-effective way to comply with the new rules. In some cases, it may be easier to simply raise the workers' salaries to the threshold, assuming their job functions meet the FLSA duties test.  In other cases, employers may want to convert the employee to an hourly rate and pay overtime for hours worked in excess of forty hours per week and implement rules to limit excessive overtime.

Friday, September 23, 2016

Department of Revenue 2017 Tax Amnesty Program Guidelines

Kevin F. Israel
412.456.2841
kfi@muslaw.com
The 2016-17 Pennsylvania budget legislation includes provisions for an amnesty program for certain delinquent Pennsylvania taxes.

The program allows a taxpayer with unpaid delinquent taxes to pay all of the back taxes plus one-half of the interest that would otherwise be due. The other half of the interest and all penalties are waived.

The Pennsylvania Department of Revenue recently announced details on the amnesty. The Pennsylvania Tax Amnesty Program (the "Amnesty Program") begins April 21, 2017, and ends on June 19, 2017 (the "Amnesty Period").  The most recent prior amnesty program was in 2010. Generally, all taxes administered by the Department of Revenue are eligible for the Amnesty Program. Below is a brief overview of the Amnesty Program:

  • Eligible for Amnesty - Individuals, businesses, and other entities with Pennsylvania tax delinquencies as of December 31, 2015, are generally eligible to participate in the Amnesty Program.
  • Notification of the Amnesty Program - A written notice will be sent for each tax delinquent, where there is a valid address on the Department's records. This notice will contain information to participate in the Amnesty Program. Taxpayers with delinquencies for multiple tax types may receive more than one notification.
  • Participation Requirements - Participants in the program must complete the following:  File an online Amnesty Return; Make payment of all taxes and one-half interest due to the Commonwealth; File completed tax returns for all required periods for which the taxpayer previously has not filed a tax return; File completed amended returns for all required periods for which the taxpayer underreported tax liability; and File all returns for tax periods not eligible for the Amnesty Program.
  • Amnesty Return - The taxpayer must register and complete an online Amnesty Return. Along with the payment for all taxes reported on the Amnesty Return and one-half of the interest on those taxes, all missing and unfiled tax returns or reports must be filed no later than June 19, 2017.
  • Extension of Time for Filing Requirements - There is NO extension available for filing missing tax returns or reports eligible for the Amnesty Program.
  • Continued Compliance - The Department may re-impose all waived penalties and interest if the taxpayer does not remain in compliance with tax obligations following the conclusion of the Amnesty Program. In addition, all taxes and returns for periods after December 31, 2015 must be paid and filed prior to the Amnesty Period.
  • Future Amnesty Programs - Participants in the 2017 Amnesty Program will be prohibited from participating in any future amnesty program offered by the Commonwealth.
  • Non-participation Penalty - Once the Amnesty Period ends on June 19, 2017, a 5% non-participation penalty will be assessed on all eligible taxes, penalties and interest that remain unpaid after the Amnesty Period ends.

Key Takeaways: 

  • Taxpayers with known delinquencies should begin the process of preparing for the Amnesty Program by engaging tax counsel or tax return preparers. It may take significant time to prepare all of the unfiled tax returns that are due with the Amnesty Return and payment. Tax return preparers should be given adequate time to prepare past due returns because the Amnesty Period begins immediately after the end of the 2016 tax return preparation season.
  • Election to not participate in the Amnesty Program will expose those taxpayers with delinquencies to an additional 5% non-participation penalty, in addition to other penalties and interest.
  • The Amnesty Program is also available to taxpayers who are under existing Deferred Payment Plans with the Department of Revenue.
  • Taxpayers who are denied interest and penalty abatement under the Amnesty Program have certain appeal rights to the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue Board of Appeals.
Kevin F. Israel is a Partner in Meyer, Unkovic & Scott's Corporate Law, Tax, and Private Clients Groups. He can be reached at 412.456.2841 or kfi@muslaw.com.

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Monday, September 12, 2016

ABA Intellectual Property Roundtable

Please join us for the next ABA Intellectual Property Roundtable scheduled for Thursday, September 29 from 12:00 – 1:00 p.m.  The program will be held in the offices of Meyer, Unkovic & Scott LLP. Lunch will be provided. The topic is Taming the Wild West of the Social Media Frontier with the Right of Publicity and Copyright Law.

Feel free to share this invite with others in your organization who may have an interest in this topic.

Please RSVP to:  rsvp@muslaw.com.


Thursday, September 1, 2016

Legal Basics Bootcamp

Date: September 22, 2016
Time: 5:00 - 8:00 p.m.
Location: Meyer, Unkovic & Scott
RSVP: Register online by September 15

Sponsored by The Center for Women’s Entrepreneurship at Chatham University

All the work that goes in to creating and building your company could be wasted if your business and assets are not properly protected. Understanding and implementing basic legal concepts is critical to protect the value of your investment.

Join attorneys, Beth Slagle, Michael Monyok and Josh Hoffman for a discussion of practical and effective steps to shield and strengthen your business.

Topics include:

  • Business formation and legal structure
  • Intellectual property, including trademark, copyright and patents
  • Contracts – from employment and independent contractors, indemnification, and insurance, to services and goods 



Thursday, August 25, 2016

Pennsylvania Building Code Update Webinar

Chad Michaelson is presenting a Pennsylvania Building Code Update Webinar on September 23 at 1:00 p.m. The event will help owners, designers, contractors and building code officials understand their obligations and navigate the confusing process of Pennsylvania building codes

Use this link to read more about the upcoming webinar and register with a 50% savings.


Friday, August 5, 2016

Fairness Opinions Rarely “Fair”

A recent decision by the Delaware Supreme Court should remind company executives that they are responsible for ensuring that fairness opinions are truly “fair.” Read more in this Post-Gazette article by Patricia Farrell, "Fairness Opinions Rarely 'Fair'".

Tuesday, August 2, 2016

Washington County Real Estate Tax Reassessment Appeal Deadline


Property owners in Washington County recently received notices of real estate reassessments. This marks the first County-wide reassessment in Washington County since 1981. County and municipal taxes will be calculated based on the new valuations starting on January 1, 2017, and school taxes will be calculated on these new values starting on July 1, 2017.

Washington County assessments are currently based on 25% of a parcel's fair market value. However, after the reassessment, the assessments will be based on 100% of the fair market value. For example, under the current system, a property valued at $200,000.00 is assessed at $50,000.00. However, after the reassessment, a property valued at $200,000.00 will be assessed at $200,000.00. As a result, most property owners have seen a significant increase in the assessed values of their properties. However, this does not translate into a commensurate increase in real estate taxes, as Pennsylvania law prohibits school districts from receiving a windfall in total taxes collected from a reassessment, and municipalities cannot receive more than a five percent (5%) increase in total taxes collected as a result of the reassessment.

Property owners have until August 10, 2016 to file a formal assessment appeal with the Washington County Tax Revenue Department. At the subsequent appeal hearing, property owners will be able to present evidence in opposition to the assessed value. This evidence can include, but is not limited to, sales of comparable properties, defects in the structure or in the condition of the land, and negative aspects of the property's location. Following the appeal hearing, the Department will issue a decision, and any aggrieved party will have 30 days to appeal that decision to the Washington County Court of Common Pleas.

At Meyer, Unkovic & Scott LLP, our experience and hard work can help property owners through the appeal process, possibly saving property owners money, by obtaining a lower assessed value. While every case is unique, factors such as the size and use of the property, comparable sales of properties in the area, and age and nature of structures in the property have an impact on the assessed value. It is important to evaluate the possibility of a tax assessment appeal and to consider obtaining an independent appraisal when you believe that your property was inaccurately assessed. Analysis of the accuracy of the property assessment is an essential component to managing your valuable real estate assets.

Frank Kosir, Jr.
412-456-2825
fk@muslaw.com
For more information about Washington County real estate tax re-assessment appeals or other real estate matters, please feel free to contact Frank or any of the attorneys in Meyer, Unkovic & Scott's award-winning Real Estate & Lending Group.

Thursday, July 21, 2016

PA Enacts New Revenue Measures to Fund 2016-17 State Budget

Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf has signed legislation raising approximately $1.3 billion in additional tax and other revenues required to balance the Commonwealth's 2016-17 budget, which was enacted earlier this month.

The new measures leave the personal income and state sales tax rates unchanged.

The new provisions include the following:

1. While the sales tax rate remained unchanged, the application of the sales tax was extended to apply to digital downloads effective August 1, 2016. Digital purchases now taxable will include e-books, games, music (including satellite radio subscriptions), photographs, and video (including streaming services such as Amazon and Netflix).

2. While the personal income tax rate has not changed, lottery winnings will now be subject to personal income taxation -- retroactive to January 1, 2016.

3. The new legislation includes a tax amnesty program which will allow taxpayers to pay outstanding taxes without penalty and with a 50% reduction of accrued interest on the unpaid balance. Details on the amnesty program will follow in a separate Client Alert. The legislation requires the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue to publish details on the amnesty program by mid-September, 2016.

4. Effective August 1, 2016, a $1.00 per pack tax increase on cigarettes will result in a total tax of $2.60 per pack.

5. A new tobacco tax on e-cigarettes and other vaping devices (40% of purchase price), smokeless tobacco, and roll-your-own tobacco purchases (55¢ per ounce) begins on October 1, 2016. The tax does not apply to cigars.

6. State casinos will now pay an additional 2% tax on table game revenues, beginning August 1, 2016.

7. Several new tax credits are included in the new legislation that will take effect in 2017. These include credits for investments in rural businesses, an increase to the film production tax credit, a credit for manufacturers that increases payroll over four consecutive quarters, credits for certain brewing operations, and credits for certain mixed-use developments and water front developments.

While personal income tax and sales rates remain unchanged, many individuals will see an increase in the taxes they pay as a result of the broadening of the bases on which these taxes are assessed.

Kevin F. Israel is a Partner in Meyer, Unkovic & Scott's Corporate Law and Tax and Succession Planning  Groups. He can be reached at 412.456.2841 or kfi@muslaw.com.

For more information about the tax measures, please contact Kevin or any of the attorneys in Meyer, Unkovic & Scott's Tax Group.